Oregon Marijuana Business Files New Lawsuit Challenging Ban On Interstate Cannabis And Hemp Commerce

An Oregon marijuana business has filed a new federal lawsuit against the
state, challenging the constitutionality of laws prohibiting interstate
cannabis commerce.

After filing an initial suit in 2022—and later withdrawing it amid
expectations of unspecified “big things” coming—the cannabis wholesaler
Jefferson Packing House (JPH) filed a revised complaint on Wednesday with
the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon.

The latest suit is lengthier than the original, and it makes additional
arguments about the alleged illegality of state laws barring marijuana *and*
hemp businesses from exporting products across state lines.

At issue in the case is the Dormant Commerce Clause (DCC) of the U.S.
Constitution, which generally prevents states from imposing restrictions on
interstate commerce in order to ensure competitiveness in the open market.

While marijuana remains federally illegal, the plaintiffs assert that the
DCC still precludes Oregon from imposing trade restrictions between states.

“Oregon law harms JPH by increasing its operating costs and preventing it
from taking advantage of economies of scale,” the filing states, adding
that state statute also harms the business with respect to hemp, which was
federally legalized under the 2018 Farm Bill.

Barring exports of marijuana and hemp puts JPH “at a competitive
disadvantage in the market,” the complaint says, because it can’t source
cannabis products from out of state and can’t ship products outside of
Oregon, “both of which limit its customer base and ability to offer a
complete range of products at the best prices.”

State law “discriminates against interstate commerce by nakedly prohibiting
such commerce, without any legitimate, non-protectionist purpose, and is
therefore prohibited by the Dormant Commerce Clause of the U.S.
Constitution,” it says. “There is no constitutionally adequate reason for
Oregon, or any other State, to bar the import or export” marijuana or hemp.

“Attempting to appease the perceived enforcement priorities of the federal
government to induce the DOJ to continue its policy of non-enforcement of
state-legal marijuana activities (which violate federal law equally as much
as interstate commerce in marijuana) implicates fatal separation of powers
concerns, as only Congress can authorize the States to regulate interstate
commerce, not the DOJ, an agency of the executive branch.”

Therefore, JPH is requesting that the court declare state law prohibiting
interstate commerce unconstitutional, enjoin the state from enforcing the
law and pay legal fees associated with the lawsuit.

In a blog post about the case, attorney Vince Sliwoski of the firm Harris
Sliwoski said that, if the plaintiffs were to prevail in the suit, “Oregon
would have the right to appeal, of course, and likely would; and it’s
possible the Ninth Circuit would take up the case. The final stop would be
the U.S. Supreme Court, though a very small percentage of federal cases get
that far.”

But this is the second time JPH has attempted to overturn the state law and
gain the right to engage in interstate commerce, which was technically
legalized in Oregon under a bill signed by then-Gov. Kate Brown (D) in
2019. That law stipulates, however, that allowing for imports and exports
of cannabis across state lines is contingent on a change in federal policy.

Lawyers for the state previously asked the court to dismiss the earlier
case, asserting that JPH lacked standing. In a motion, they wrote that
because federal law also prohibits the export of cannabis products, the
company’s “alleged injuries are not likely to be addressed by the relief
that it is seeking.” Further, they argued the DCC does not apply as the
lawsuit describes it.

“That doctrine prohibits states from treating interstate and intrastate
commerce differently,” the state’s filing said. “Here, however, there is no
interstate commerce to treat differently.”

A reply last March from Jefferson, however, contended that the federal
Controlled Substances Act (CSA) “did not ‘eliminate’ commerce in marijuana
any more than a criminal statute ‘eliminates’ the act or conduct it
forbids.”

It remains unclear what might have led the company to drop its prior legal
challenge. Federal rescheduling of marijuana—as is currently being
contemplated by the Trump administration—would conceivably allow some
cross-border cannabis trade, at least of any medications approved by the
Food and Drug Administration (FDA), but it’s unlikely a Schedule III
designation in itself would allow state-licensed cannabis businesses to
broadly engage in interstate commerce.


*— Marijuana Moment is tracking hundreds of cannabis, psychedelics and drug
policy bills in state legislatures and Congress this year. Patreon
supporters pledging at least $25/month get access to our interactive maps,
charts and hearing calendar so they don’t miss any developments.*


*Learn more about our marijuana bill tracker and become a supporter on
Patreon to get access. —*

Oregon, California and Washington State have each enacted laws related to
interstate cannabis commerce in recent years.

In 2022, a federal appellate court ruled that Maine’s law prohibiting
non-residents from owning medical marijuana businesses in the state
violated the DCC. Some experts believe the same rationale invalidating the
residency restrictions comes into play with state-level bans on marijuana
imports and exports.

Disallowing imports and exports of medical cannabis between consenting
states could be construed as similarly protectionist and unconstitutional,
the thinking goes.

Separately in Oregon, the governor and other state officials are asking a
federal appeals court to reverse a judge’s decision blocking a
voter-approved law to require licensed marijuana businesses to enter into
labor peace agreements with workers and mandate that employers remain
neutral in discussions around unionization.

*Read the Oregon cannabis interstate commerce legal complaint below:*

*Photo courtesy of Mike Latimer.*

The post Oregon Marijuana Business Files New Lawsuit Challenging Ban On
Interstate Cannabis And Hemp Commerce appeared first on Marijuana Moment.