Steve Bevan, a key figure in drafting the hemp language in the 2018 Farm Bill, argues that the emergence of intoxicating cannabinoid products is not due to a "loophole" but rather the intentional language added to the law and subsequent inaction by lawmakers and regulators like the FDA. Bevan's letter to GOP leaders opposes a proposed ban, suggesting that simple age restrictions and regulation are the solution, not prohibition, which he claims would only boost the illicit market. He suggests that state attorneys general advocating for a ban are likely motivated by competition with the cannabis businesses in their states. The article also notes that major alcohol industry associations support a ban and highlights the disagreement among GOP lawmakers, with Senator Rand Paul opposing the ban aggressively, while Senator Mitch McConnell pushes for it. Congress has two options: prohibit the products or create a regulatory framework with quality standards and age requirements.

Expert Who Helped Write Farm Bill Says Hemp Intoxicating Products Were Intentional, Not a Loophole

Nov 5, 2025

Source:

Kyle Jaeger

Marijuana Moment

The 2018 Farm Bill’s hemp legalization was no accident, according to Steve Bevan, a key architect of the legislation. While some lawmakers now claim the rise of intoxicating hemp-derived cannabinoids is a "loophole" that needs closing, Bevan argues the language was intentionally broad to help farmers succeed. In a letter to GOP leaders, he suggests that the current chaos stems from the FDA’s refusal to regulate the market rather than a legislative mistake.

Prohibitionists, including major alcohol lobbyists and several state attorneys general, are pushing for a total ban. However, Bevan and advocates like Senator Rand Paul point out that simple age-gating and safety standards would protect consumers without destroying a thriving industry. For the everyday toker, this is a massive deal. Hemp-derived products have expanded accessibility and wellness options for millions. Shifting back toward prohibition wouldn't just kill small businesses; it would likely push enthusiasts back into an unregulated illicit market. We need smart oversight and quality control, not another round of the failed drug war.