top of page
tokers-guide-find-the-best-weed-in-dc-lo
NEW 1 to 1 photo editing 122024 (17).png
A coalition of anti-marijuana groups urged the Supreme Court in an amicus brief for U.S. v. Hemani to uphold the federal ban on gun ownership for cannabis users, arguing that modern, potent marijuana is strongly linked to violence and severe mental illness, posing a greater danger than alcohol. This case addresses a growing conflict among lower federal courts, many of which have recently ruled the federal prohibition (922(g)(3)) unconstitutional based on Second Amendment rights and a lack of historical precedent.

Anti-Legalization Groups Tell Supreme Court Cannabis Is More Dangerous Than Alcohol

Dec 16, 2025

Source:

Kyle Jaeger

Marijuana Moment

The Supreme Court is currently at the center of a heated battle over whether cannabis users should be allowed to own firearms. A group of prohibitionist organizations, including SAM, recently filed a brief urging the court to maintain the federal gun ban. Their argument? They claim modern marijuana is a "dangerous" drug linked to psychosis and violence, even going as far as to suggest it’s more hazardous than alcohol. This push comes as several lower courts have already signaled that the ban might be unconstitutional under the Second Amendment.

For the average toker, this case is a massive deal. It highlights the lingering stigma and "Reefer Madness" era rhetoric still being used to justify stripping away the constitutional rights of peaceful consumers. If the Supreme Court rules against the ban, it would be a landmark victory for community members who believe that enjoying a plant shouldn't make you a second-class citizen. This is about more than just guns; it's about the ongoing struggle for fair treatment and the end of discriminatory federal policies.

Recent Reviews

bottom of page