Menu
Washington DC
DC Dispensaries
DC Weed Reviews
DC Medical Reviews
How to Buy Weed in DC
I-71 Information
History of Legal Weed in DC
DC Medical Marijuana Guide
Virginia
Find the BEST weed in...
Australian Health Authorities Take Action Against 57 Medical Practitioners Over Cannabis Prescribing Practices
Jul 10, 2025
TG Branfalt
Ganjapreneur
The Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA) has taken
action against 57 medical practitioners, pharmacists, and nurses – and are
investigating 60 more – over medical cannabis prescribing practices, the Australian
Broadcasting Company (ABC) reports. The AHPRA found six practitioners who
issued more than 10,000 medical cannabis scripts over a six-month period,
including one who issued over 17,000 in one working day.
The AHPRA has released new guidelines for medical cannabis prescriptions –
which state that except for childhood epilepsy, muscle spasms, and pain
associated with multiple sclerosis, cancer and chemotherapy-induced nausea
and vomiting, “there is little evidence to support the use of medicinal
cannabis” – and is urging prescribers to put patient health above profits.
The guidelines further state that cannabis should not be prescribed as a
first-line treatment and only be used when there is an evidence-supported
clinical indication and when other treatments have failed.
AHPRA chief executive Justin Untersteiner told ABC that the regulator has
serious concerns for patient safety and that patients are presenting “to
emergency departments with medicinal-cannabis-induced psychosis,” which
“can particularly happen where there are patients that have pre-existing
mental health conditions or substance abuse or other issues like that.”
“Another area that worries us is … prescribing excessive quantities or even
prescribing multiple different prescriptions to a single patient so they
can try which one suits them.” — Untersteiner to ABC
Additionally, the AHPRA found consultations for medical cannabis lasted
between a few seconds and a few minutes; prescriptions by patient request;
not fully assessing patients’ substance abuse histories; prescriptions for
individuals under 18; excessive prescribed quantities; failure to check the
real-time monitoring system; not coordinating with the patients’ other
practitioners; self-prescribing or prescribing for family members; and
practitioners only prescribing products supplied by companies they are
associated with.













