top of page
tokers-guide-find-the-best-weed-in-dc-lo
NEW 1 to 1 photo editing 122024 (17).png
A federal judge ruled that the measure requiring Oregon cannabis businesses to set up labor agreements with their workers violates the First Amendment. The lawsuit was filed by Ascend and Bubble’s Hash. Judge Michael Simon said the measure doesn’t distinguish between permissible employer speech and threatening speech. Simon entered a permanent injunction, barring the enforcement of the measure.

Federal Judge Blocks Oregon Voter-Approved Measure Requiring Cannabis Labor Peace Agreements

May 22, 2025

TG Branfalt

Ganjapreneur



A federal judge on Tuesday ruled that the voter-approved measure requiring
Oregon cannabis businesses to set up labor agreements with their workers as
a licensing condition violates the First Amendment right of business owners
and is preempted by federal law. Measure 119 required cannabis retailers
and processors “to agree to remain neutral when labor organizations
communicate with employees about collective bargaining rights,” according
to the measure text.

The lawsuit was filed by Ascend, a Portland-based retailer, and Bubble’s
Hash, an edibles and concentrates manufacturer. In the decision, U.S.
District Judge Michael Simon said the measure “does not distinguish between
permissible employer speech and threatening or coercive speech.”

“Measure 119 seeks to regulate – and, indeed, forbid – certain truthful,
non-deceptive, non-coercive speech about unionization, which conflicts with
Congress’s intent to allow ‘uninhibited, robust, and wide-open debate in
labor disputes.’” — Simon in the decision

Simon added that state lawyers defending the measure “do not explain how an
employer can remain ‘neutral’ with respect to union representatives
communicating with its employees while still being free to express its
opinions about unionization.”

“Measure 119 is not limited to restricting only threatening, coercive,
false, or misleading speech,” Simon wrote, “but instead prohibits all
speech by employers that is not ‘neutral’ toward unionization.”

Simon entered a permanent injunction, barring the enforcement of the
measure.

Recent Reviews

bottom of page