top of page
tokers-guide-find-the-best-weed-in-dc-lo
NEW 1 to 1 photo editing 122024 (17).png
A former Nebraska state senator, John Kuehn, has appealed a second case to the Nebraska Supreme Court, seeking to invalidate the state’s voter-approved medical cannabis laws. Kuehn argues the laws are unconstitutional due to federal marijuana laws and that the creation of the Medical Cannabis Commission is an unlawful delegation of lawmaking authority. A district judge previously ruled Kuehn lacked "standing" to sue. The Nebraska Supreme Court will also hear a separate appeal from Kuehn regarding the validity of petition signatures for the ballot measures. Supporters of the medical cannabis laws view these challenges as an "abuse of power."

Former Nebraska Senator Seeks High Court Review In Medical Marijuana Case Seeking To Scrap Voter-Approved Legalization Law

Jul 8, 2025

Marijuana Moment

Marijuana Moment



*“This latest appeal is just another desperate attempt to silence the will
of Nebraskans, who overwhelmingly support safe, legal access to medical
cannabis.”*

*By Zach Wendling, Nebraska Examiner*

A former state senator appealed a second case to the Nebraska Supreme Court
seeking to invalidate the state’s voter-approved medical cannabis laws.

Former state Sen. John Kuehn of Heartwell, a former member of the State
Board of Health and a longtime marijuana opponent, filed the brief appeal
request Saturday. Kuehn has asked the Nebraska Supreme Court to step in
without going through the intermediate Nebraska Court of Appeals. The
courts have not yet decided whether to take up the appeal.

Kuehn seeks to argue that the 2024 voter-approved laws to legalize and
regulate medical cannabis are unconstitutional because of federal laws
against marijuana.

“Plaintiff has a right to appeal directly to the Supreme Court because his
case challenges the constitutionality of Nebraska laws,” the one-page
filing states.

Lancaster County District Judge Susan Strong on June 26 ruled that Kuehn
could not prove “injury in fact,” known as “standing,” as a direct result
of the medical cannabis laws.

Strong disagreed with Kuehn’s arguments that he should be able to sue
because taxpayer funds would help carry out the laws, such as employee
time, and that the laws were a “matter of great public concern.”

“Nebraska, like other states, has no shortage of citizen-taxpayers with
strong political opinions. That is not necessarily a bad thing,” Strong
wrote. “But it would be bad if all those citizens could sue whenever a law
requires a government employee to do something.”

Among Kuehn’s main contentions is that Nebraska shouldn’t be able to create
a medical cannabis program because of federal law classifying marijuana as
a Schedule I drug. A Schedule I drug is one that the federal government
says has a high potential for abuse and no accepted medical uses. A
bipartisan swath of advocates has called for rescheduling the drug for
decades.

Nearly 40 states, including Nebraska, have laws on the books for some form
of medical cannabis program.

Kuehn also argues that the creation of the new Nebraska Medical Cannabis
Commission, the members of which are named in the lawsuit, is an unlawful
delegation of lawmaking authority.

The preemption case also names Gov. Jim Pillen (R), Secretary of State Bob
Evnen, State Treasurer Tom Briese, Tax Commissioner Jim Kamm and the ballot
sponsors who ushered the laws through the 2024 election.

Nebraska Attorney General Mike Hilgers (R) and his office, who are
representing the state defendants, had asked for the case to be dismissed.

However, the AG’s Office did so after pledging to sue the Medical Cannabis
Commission once it begins licensing medical cannabis establishments while
making similar preemption arguments as Kuehn. Licensing must begin by
October 1.

The Nebraska Supreme Court, as early as September, will hear a separate
appeal from Kuehn, Evnen and Hilgers that seeks to invalidate the medical
cannabis laws. That case, targeting Evnen and the ballot sponsors, argues
there were not enough valid petition signatures for the ballot measures to
have been placed on the 2024 ballot in the first place.

Strong presided over that earlier case and ruled last November in favor of
the ballot measures. About 71 percent of Nebraskans voted to legalize the
drug, and about 67 percent voted to regulate it.

Crista Eggers, executive director of Nebraskans for Medical Marijuana, the
2024 campaign that ushered in the new laws, said the continued legal
challenges “are nothing short of an abuse of power.”

“This latest appeal is just another desperate attempt to silence the will
of Nebraskans, who overwhelmingly support safe, legal access to medical
cannabis,” Eggers said in a statement. “We will not be intimidated.”

*This story was first published by Nebraska Examiner.*

*Photo courtesy of M a n u e l.*

The post Former Nebraska Senator Seeks High Court Review In Medical
Marijuana Case Seeking To Scrap Voter-Approved Legalization Law appeared
first on Marijuana Moment.

Recent Reviews

bottom of page